Why Jamming or Preventing Certain Frequencies are good, Humans Similar to Computers/Caution to Individuals Interested in making a Thinking Computer, and No Such thing as a Bad Person?
I personally believe that it is possible to hide a cell phone and a person can think they hear their continues though it is someone talking. Why else do they cell some special cell phones with out a ringer or vibrator? One can even use a CB. I also believe one can place a small cell phone in a person with a pezero speaker or since the eyes see frequency and the ears hear frequency it might be possible to attach a receiver to a ear vain pulsing a certain frequency that the ear works with. Even a more complex one might be able to work with a lens/magnify glass/metal that can focus electrons that maybe in theory, that can easily penetrate the skin (light can penetrate the skin a bit though I believe the electrons might be 1800 times smaller in theory)(put your hand over a flash light at night), to the ear vain or eye vain and pulse a transition of words or images into the person. This device then can be hooked up to a computer that can tract the ear vein like a gps system though the body’s shape. I believe every body deserves the right to think and speak for them self. The people need to know how to prevent machines devices controlled by other people or machines from controlling the people. I also believe if the 2nd paragraphs listed above are proven one day to be true then it is possible to enter the brain and read or even adjust the program it like a computer hard drive. Please note if you try this use your hand to start and speak with a doctor that knows the brain first. No one deserves to be mentally harmed through an experiment even if the person had no intended to do that to the person. And know one deserves pain, no one. If a calculator adds 2+2 and it states 5 one might say it is broke or one might say it is an excellent first example of a start of electricity thinking or a device that will make life a lot easier. After reviewing the human body and electricity and frequency in theory I find the body to be similar to a computer if not exactly the same in theory. Therefore there is no such thing as a bad person if you understand the calculator thought in the beginning of the paragraph. And the brain programming part disused in the above paragraph. Please note: If you are trying to make a thinking computer be very careful. One can design a computer that does not feel pain or can remove the pain chip. If you do it this way and you get the computer to think like a person what if the computer needs or wants something and a person could only get it or do it then it might do something wrong (pain) to you to get what it needs. Please be once again very cautious if you a trying to make a thing computer. Have a good day.
|
4493
| | Poor Taste?
| | |
|
I think what you are saying is about the risk we take when
we create artificial intelligence in robots, or in any form. You are saying that the robot can be humanized
to a point, if you omit a certain discs from its infrastructure. All of your points are well taken, and I don’t
see what we would need to create these multi-faceted clones with PHD –Degree intelligence
for anyway. Also, I think you are
suggesting that without a system of morals, these robots could or would do
whatever it took to obtain objects or information that they had been programmed
to obtain, without regard for the welfare of others because that kind of action
would need a conscience,or system of moral values to be operational; if such a
thing could be constructed, and then implanted into a non-human machine. If in the future, a certain type of work
force is needed, and there are no employees, who would be willing or able to
perform the tasks at hand; perhaps some kind of one- dimensional robot could be
used to a greater extent then they are now, but I would hope that the
scientific community and manufacturers would be aware of these conceptual
problems, and avoid them.
| | Poor Taste?
| | |
|
|